ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Use of ultra-low contrast dose CT aortography for the management of aortic aneurysmal disease.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of third-generation dual-source CT-based dynamic imaging reconstruction for pulmonary embolism imaging.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Trial
- Inguinal intranodal CT lymphangiography for thoracic duct injury: feasibility with rapid scanning.European radiology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Ultra-Dilute Iodine Contrast Agent in Dual-Layer Spectral CT for Pulmonary Artery ImagingCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComputed tomography aortography (CTA) is used in the assessment of aortic pathologies and planning of surgical intervention. However, its dependence on iodinated contrast can result in development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The potential concern of CI-AKI has spurred research into the potential of administration of low contrast volumes in CTA investigations while maintaining overall diagnostic appeal. Several studies have shown that CTA using contrast volumes as low as 30 mL (equivalent to 10.5 g of iodine) can still yield scans of diagnostic quality. We present a retrospective pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of utilising an ultra-low volume of iodinated intravenous contrast in a population of patients with severe renal insufficiency with referral from our vascular surgery unit for CTA evaluation of the thoracic and abdominal aorta.
methodsThis retrospective pilot study examined 12 CTA scans performed with 20 mLs of iodinated contrast and assessed image quality with both quantitative and qualitative markers. All scans were performed on a Siemens SOMATOM Force dual-source CT scanner. Quantitative assessment values were measured via attenuation values at eight aortoiliac locations and used to calculate a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at each location. Qualitative analysis of image quality and viability for surgical intervention was obtained from subjective clinical assessment by an interventional radiologist and vascular surgeon.
resultsObtained quantitative assessment values included mean attenuation 189.9 HU, mean SNR 9.6 and mean CNR 8.0. All 12 scans demonstrated individual mean SNR values above predetermined quality thresholds while only five scans produced individual mean CNR values above threshold. Eleven of 12 scans were determined to be of sufficient quality for diagnosis and planning of surgical intervention.
conclusionsOur results suggest that CTA utilising an ultra-low contrast dose of 20 mLs (6 g iodine) yields scans of diagnostic quality for therapeutic decision-making in vascular surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.