ArticleBMC neurology2024
Neuroimaging feature in identifying acute myelopathy etiologies: comparison between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe clinical symptoms of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and acute cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) may overlap in some cases. This study aimed to investigate the differences in imaging features between NMOSD and CSM in acute myelopathy.
methodsWe included 78 patients in this retrospective study, including 28 NMOSD patients and 50 CSM patients. The demographic characteristics and clinical symptoms of the two groups of patients were compared. The T1 signal intensity, length of the spinal cord involved by T2 hyperintensity, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, proportion of thoracic and lumbar cord involvement, proportion of brain involvement and lesion enhancement rate in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared between the two groups of patients. The number, length, location on the sagittal image, pattern on the sagittal image, and distribution on the axial image of the lesions in the contrast-enhanced MRI of the two groups were evaluated.
resultsThere were differences between NMOSD and CSM patients in the proportion of women, the proportion of bowel and bladder symptoms, mRS levels, the length of the spinal cord involved by T2 hyperintensity, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, the proportion of thoracic and lumbar cord involvement, the proportion of brain involvement, the enhancement rate and number of lesions (p < 0.05). Among NMOSD patients, linear, patchy and ring or semi-ring enhancement were present in 8(30.8%) ,14 (53.8%) and 4(15.4%)patients, respectively, and axial gray and white matter were involved in 17 (65.4%) patients. Among patients with CSM, 9(36.0%) patients showed longitudinal oriented flake, 16 (64.0%) patients showed pancake-like enhancement, and 21 (84.0%) patients showed axial white matter involvement only. The differences in enhancement pattern on sagittal images and axial involvement were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
conclusionsEarly differential diagnosis of NMOSD and CSM in acute myelopathy can be made by analyzing images and the number, length, sagittal enhancement pattern, and axial involvement of gadolinium-enhanced lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.