Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358678›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024

Demographics and scope of Australian emergency department physiotherapists.

Tina Vickery, Lindsey Brett, Taryn Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina VickeryHealth Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Tina.vickery@hdr.mq.edu.au.
Lindsey BrettCentre for positive ageing, Hammond Care, Adelaide, Australia.
Taryn JonesOffice of Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), Taryn Jones, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionsTo provide workforce data on the status of Australian Emergency Department (ED) physiotherapy practice, including physiotherapist demographic data, staffing levels and funding sources. Evaluate the scope of practice currently undertaken by ED physiotherapists and alignment of ED physiotherapy service provision with demand levels.

designCross sectional survey.

participantsAustralian physiotherapists working within an Australian ED. OUTCOME MEASURES: Workforce data, scope of practice and alignment of physiotherapy service provision to ED presentations and demand.

results94 Australian ED physiotherapists completed the survey, 76.9% were working as primary contact clinicians. They had a diverse scope of practice, 100% perform mobility assessments, 89.9% provide care for paediatric patients and 10.1% were involved in administration of medications. 86.2% of participants (75/87) reported working within a service model that provided seven-day per week physiotherapy coverage to ED.

conclusionThe sample of ED physiotherapists were found to be experienced and highly trained clinicians with a diverse scope of practice, who are well placed to meet the unpredictable and highly variable patient caseload of Australian EDs.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentEmergency physiotherapistPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39358678
PMCPMC11460438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.