Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358665›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Performance, ruminal and fecal microbiome of lambs fed diets supplemented with probiotics.

Marcella Oliveira Machado, Diógenes Adriano Duarte Santana, Matheus Borges de Carvalho, Rüdiger Daniel Ollhoff, Saulo Henrique Weber, Cristina Santos Sotomaior

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcella Oliveira MachadoGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-2830
Diógenes Adriano Duarte SantanaGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-058X
Matheus Borges de CarvalhoGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5211-4136
Rüdiger Daniel OllhoffGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-9472
Saulo Henrique WeberGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-8044
Cristina Santos SotomaiorGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil. cristina.sotomaior@pucpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-3743

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of adding two doses of a commercial probiotic on productive performance, ruminal and fecal microbiome in growing lambs. Forty-two Texel or Ile de France crossbred lambs aged 86.9 ± 8.0 days (body weight: 27.4 ± 3.7 kg) were distributed into three groups: basal diet without probiotic supplementation (CG); basal diet + 1 g/animal/day of probiotic (GP1) and basal diet + 5 g/animal/day of probiotic (GP5). The experimental period was 84 days. The weight was evaluated weekly and dry matter intake (DMI) and leftovers were measured daily. At the end of the experiment, lambs were slaughtered. Feces and rumen fluid were collected for microbiome analysis and rumen fragments for histological evaluation. The use of probiotics did not affect weight gain, but GP1 showed a higher silage and DMI intake than CG (p < 0.001). The CG had a greater thickness of keratinized epithelium and stratum corneum (< 0.001) than GP1 and GP5, and greater total papilla width (p = 0.039) than GP1. There was no difference in the general abundance in the rumen and fecal microbiomes. GP5 had a higher proportion of Azoarcus and Dialister taxa in the rumen fluid (p = 0.012 and p = 0.017, respectively) and higher proportion of Treponema and Fibrobacter taxa in the fecal microbiome (p = 0.015 and p = 0.026, respectively), whereas CG had a higher proportion of Anaeroplasma than the other groups (p = 0.032). These results demonstrated the benefits of probiotics for ruminal epithelium protection and microbial diversity. However, there was no effect on performance parameters.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietDietary SupplementsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsRumenSheep, DomesticAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsMaleSheepMicrobiotaRumenSheepZootechnical additive

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.