Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358591›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2025

Classifying compounds as prebiotics - scientific perspectives and recommendations.

Robert Hutkins, Jens Walter, Glenn R Gibson, Cassandre Bedu-Ferrari, Karen Scott, Daniel J Tancredi, Anisha Wijeyesekera, Mary Ellen Sanders

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  12. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  13. Development of tea-based (Food science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert HutkinsUniversity of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-5947
Jens WalterUniversity College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-172X
Glenn R GibsonFood and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0566-0476
Cassandre Bedu-FerrariTeagasc Food Research Centre, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-7735
Karen ScottRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4608-0013
Daniel J TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Anisha WijeyesekeraFood and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-5065
Mary Ellen SandersInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO, USA. Maryellen@isappscience.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-3423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes provide key contributions to health and potentially important therapeutic targets. Conceived nearly 30 years ago, the prebiotic concept posits that targeted modulation of host microbial communities through the provision of selectively utilized growth substrates provides an effective approach to improving health. Although the basic tenets of this concept remain the same, it is timely to address certain challenges pertaining to prebiotics, including establishing that prebiotic-induced microbiota modulation causes the health outcome, determining which members within a complex microbial community directly utilize specific substrates in vivo and when those microbial effects sufficiently satisfy selectivity requirements, and clarification of the scientific principles on which the term 'prebiotic' is predicated to inspire proper use. In this Expert Recommendation, we provide a framework for the classification of compounds as prebiotics. We discuss ecological principles by which substrates modulate microbiomes and methodologies useful for characterizing such changes. We then propose statistical approaches that can be used to establish causal links between selective effects on the microbiome and health effects on the host, which can help address existing challenges. We use this information to provide the minimum criteria needed to classify compounds as prebiotics. Furthermore, communications to consumers and regulatory approaches to prebiotics worldwide are discussed.

Indexed as

PrebioticsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMicrobiotaPrebiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.