Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358574›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2024

Employing Bacillus and Pseudomonas for phytonematode management in agricultural crops.

Rupali Gupta, Gautam Anand, Rakesh Pandey, Maya Bar, Dinesh Yadav

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rupali Gupta *Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Gautam Anand *Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Rakesh PandeyDepartment of Microbial Technology and Nematology, CSIR- Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP, Lucknow, India.
Maya BarDepartment of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, Israel. mayabar@volcani.agri.gov.il.
Dinesh YadavDepartment of Biotechnology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. dinesh.biotech@ddugu.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytonematodes are responsible for causing significant harm and reducing yields in various agricultural crops. To minimize losses caused by phytonematodes and meet the high demand for agricultural production, it is important to develop effective strategies with minimal environmental impact to manage this biotic stress. Due to the adverse environmental effects associated with synthetic pesticides, it is imperative to use beneficial bacteria, such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp., for biocontrol purposes to control phytonematode infestation in agricultural settings. This approach has gained considerable attraction, as there is a promising market for eco-friendly biopesticides based on bacteria that can effectively manage phytonematodes. Furthermore, biocontrol strains of Bacillus and Pseudomonas have the potential to enhance crop productivity by producing various substances that promote plant growth and development. This review aims to explore the role of Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp. in phytonematode management, elucidate different mechanisms by which these bacteria suppress nematode populations, and discuss the future prospects of utilizing these bacteria in agriculture.

Indexed as

BacillusCrops, AgriculturalPest Control, BiologicalPlant DiseasesPseudomonasAgricultureAnimalsBiological Control AgentsNematodaBiological Control AgentsBacillusBiocontrol agentInduced systemic resistancePhytonematodesPseudomonas

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.