ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
T(11;14) with multiple myeloma: Standard risk survival but slow and poor response.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A single-cell atlas of multiple myeloma defines malignant archetypes and proliferative states.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- [Predictive value of next-generation sequencing-based measurable residual disease quantitative stratification for early disease progression in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after induction therapy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- t(11;14) multiple myeloma patient: minimal residual disease after 10 years of follow-up - a case report.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Risk factors for multiple myeloma and its precursor diseases.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We described 790 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including 224 (28.4%) standard risk (SR) patients without t(11;14), 99 (12.5%) patients with t(11;14)alone, 58 (7.3%) with t(11;14) + HR, and 409 (51.8%) in the high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (HRCA) group including t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), C1A1 and/or del(17p) but without t(11;14), to evaluate the impact of t(11;14) in NDMM patients on response rate, response kinetics and survival. Our study showed that NDMM patients in the t(11;14)alone group had similar PFS (49.3 vs. 50.7 months; P = 0.392) and OS (112.4 vs. NR months; P = 0.982) as those in the SR group. However, the t(11;14)alone group exhibited a significantly poorer depth of response compared to the SR group, particularly with a lower MRD negativity rate (60.0% vs. 76.0%, P = 0.009). In the t(11;14)alone group, MRD status did not significantly impact PFS or OS, which was in contrast to the other groups. Response kinetics analyses showed that the t(11;14)alone group had a slower response rate than the other subgroups (t(11;14)alone vs. SR vs. HRCA: median time to MRD negativity = 9.19 vs. 4.25 vs. 4.27 months; P < 0.001). Our study showed that t(11;14)alone was characterized by survival comparable to standard risk cytogenetics despite exhibiting the slowest timing of response onset and lowest plateau of remission, which suggested a relatively indolent clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39358544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.