Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358516›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

A neural code supporting prospective probabilistic reasoning for instrumental information demand in humans.

Nicholas M Singletary, Guillermo Horga, Jacqueline Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas M SingletaryDoctoral Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. nicholas.singletary@nyspi.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2308-5353
Guillermo Horga *New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA. guillermo.horga@nsypi.columbia.edu.
Jacqueline Gottlieb *Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. jg2141@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6507-4375

Funding

Deficient Belief Updating as a Convergent Computational Mechanism of PsychosisR01MH114965 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HORGA, GUILLERMO · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Individualized risk prediction in persons at clinical high-risk for psychosis using neuromelanin-sensitive MRI.R01MH117323 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HORGA, GUILLERMO · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Columbia University CU-ZI-MR-S-0011National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-1644869NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114965NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117323U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH114965U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH117323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When making adaptive decisions, we actively demand information, but relatively little is known about the mechanisms of active information gathering. An open question is how the brain prospectively estimates the information gains that are expected to accrue from various sources by integrating simpler quantities of prior certainty and the reliability (diagnosticity) of a source. We examine this question using fMRI in a task in which people placed bids to obtain information in conditions that varied independently in the rewards, decision uncertainty, and information diagnosticity. We show that, consistent with value of information theory, the participants' bids are sensitive to prior certainty (the certainty about the correct choice before gathering information) and expected posterior certainty (the certainty expected after gathering information). Expected posterior certainty is decoded from multivoxel activation patterns in the posterior parietal and extrastriate cortices. This representation is independent of instrumental rewards and spatially overlaps with distinct representations of prior certainty and expected information gains. The findings suggest that the posterior parietal and extrastriate cortices are candidates for mediating the prospection of posterior probabilities as a key step to anticipating information gains during active gathering of instrumental information.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleProbabilityRewardUncertaintyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39358516
PMCPMC11447085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.