ArticleNature2024
Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward an integrated and globally equitable understanding of political polarization.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Community Notes undermoderate polarizing content by design creating risks in electoral processes.Science advances · 2026Article
- Vaccine-related misinformation and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination in Japan.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- How defense rhetoric escalates intergroup conflict.iScience · 2025Article
- Self-supervised learning with a contrastive VideoMoCo framework for Saudi Arabic sign language recognition using 3D convolutional networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Divergent patterns of engagement with partisan and low-quality news across seven social media platforms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Republicans are flagged more often than Democrats for sharing misinformation on X's Community Notes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Perceived legitimacy of layperson and expert content moderators.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Health insurance policy enforcement and catastrophic health expenditure: a case study in Sichuan province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Fact-checks focus on famous politicians, not partisans.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Promoting engagement with social fact-checks online: Investigating the roles of social connection and shared partisanship.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to intense pressure, technology companies have enacted policies to combat misinformation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.