Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358474›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Risk factors underlining reproductive performance in smallholder beef cattle herds of South Africa.

Marble Nkadimeng, Este Van Marle-Köster, Nkhanedzeni B Nengovhela, Fhulufhelo V Ramukhithi, Masindi L Mphaphathi, Johannes M Rust, Mahlako L Makgahlela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marble NkadimengDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. nkadimengm1@arc.agric.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-0568
Este Van Marle-KösterDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3672-6976
Nkhanedzeni B NengovhelaDepartment of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Delpen Building, Corner Annie Botha, and Union Street, Riviera, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-5789
Fhulufhelo V RamukhithiAgricultural Research Council, Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane, 0062, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-5315
Masindi L MphaphathiAgricultural Research Council, Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane, 0062, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2350-9593
Johannes M RustDöhne Agricultural Development Institute, Stutterheim, 4930, South Africa.
Mahlako L MakgahlelaAgricultural Research Council, Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane, 0062, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-4558

Funding

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research LS-2016-276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the historically low reproductive performance of beef cattle in smallholder systems is essential for its productivity and profitability. Therefore, identifying and addressing risk factors associated with low performance in this system present an opportunity for improvement. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of animal and management risk factors on pregnancy rate (PR), fetal and calf loss (FC), calving interval (CI) and days open (DO) in smallholder beef cattle farms. A multi-stage selection approach was conducted in five provinces of South Africa. Cow records (3694) collected from 40 smallholder herds over two years (2018-2019) were analysed. Data on animal and herd management factors including body condition score (BCS), cow age class, breed type, lactation status, culling old/non-productive cows, record-keeping, and breeding and calving seasons were recorded. The GLIMMIX procedure was computed to determine risk factors associated with performance indicators (PR, FC, CI and DO). Risk factors highly associated with performance were breed type, BCS, cow-age class and breeding/calving season (P ≤ 0.05). Indicators FC, DO and CI increased with decreased BCS, autumn calving seasons, and in first calvers and aged cows. Whereas, PR increased with increasing odds of BCS and breeding seasons between December-March, November-February and January-March. Optimizing reproductive performance in smallholder beef cattle herds may involve managing cow body condition, breeding with adapted genotypes and synchronizing breeding with favourable seasons. Therefore, record keeping and regular monitoring of herd nutrition, climate and breed performance may be significant in improving reproductive performance in smallholder herds.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryReproductionAnimalsBreedingCattleFemaleLactationPregnancyPregnancy RateRisk FactorsSeasonsSouth AfricaHerd performancePregnancy rateReproduction efficiencyReproductive management

Identifiers

PMID39358474
PMCPMC11446968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.