ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2024
Multi-omics analysis and response prediction of PD-1 monoclonal antibody containing regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled multi-omics biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade: mechanisms, predictive modeling, and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors and lymphoma in the past 26 years (2000-2025).Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Safety and clinical outcomes of orelabrutinib, lenalidomide plus sintilimab for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) show varied responses to PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) containing regimens. The mechanisms and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of this regimen are unclear. This study retrospectively collected r/r DLBCL patients who received PD-1 mAb and rituximab regimens as salvage therapy. Clinical and genomic features were collected, and mechanisms were explored by multiplex immunofluorescence and digital spatial profiling. An artificial neural network (ANN) model was constructed to predict the response. Between October 16th, 2018 and May 4th, 2023, 50 r/r DLBCL patients were collected, 29 were response patients and 21 were non-response patients. CREBBP (p = 0.029) and TP53 (p = 0.015) alterations were statistically higher in non-response patients. Patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 were correlated with a longer overall survival (OS) than those with PD-L1 CPS < 5 (median OS: not reached vs. 9.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-22.44, p = 0.016). Immune-related pathways were activated in response patients. The proportion and spatial organization of tumor-infiltrating immune cells affect the response. PD-L1 CPS level, age, and alterations of TP53, MYD88, CREBBP, EP300, GNA13 were used to build an ANN predictive model that showed high prediction efficiency (training set area under curve [AUC] of 0.97 and test set AUC of 0.94). The proportion and spatial distribution of tumor-infiltrating immune cells may be related to the function of immune-related pathways, thereby influencing the efficacy of PD-1 mAb containing regimens. The ANN predictive model showed potential value in predicting the responses of r/r DLBCL patients received PD-1 mAb and rituximab regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.