ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Expedient measurement of total protein in human serum and plasma via the biuret method using fiber optic probe for patient samples and certified reference materials.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast ratiometric colorimetric sensing of total protein content in human serum based on classic biuret method.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biuret method is currently recognized as a reference measurement procedure for serum/plasma total protein by the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM). However, as the reaction involved in this method is highly time-dependent, to ensure identical measurement conditions for calibrator and samples for high accuracy, a fast and simple measurement procedure is critical to ensure the precision and trueness of this method. We measured serum/plasma total protein using a Cary 60 spectrophotometer coupled with a fiber optic probe, which was faster and simpler than the conventional cuvette method. The biuret method utilizing alkaline solutions of copper sulfate and potassium sodium tartrate was added to the sample and calibrator (NIST SRM 927e) incubated for 1 h before measurement. A panel of samples consisting of pooled human serum, single donor serum, and certified reference materials (CRMs) from three sources were measured for method validation. Sixteen native patient samples were measured using the newly developed biuret method and compared against clinical analyzers. Additionally, the results of three cycles of a local External Quality Assessment (EQA) Programme submitted by participating clinical laboratories were compared against the biuret method. Our biuret method using fiber optic probe demonstrated good precision with within-day relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.04 to 0.23% and between-day RSD of 0.58%. The deviations between the obtained values and the certified values for all three CRMs ranged from -0.38 to 1.60%, indicating good method trueness. The routine methods using clinical analyzers were also found to agree well with the developed biuret method using fiber optic probe for EQA samples and native patient samples. The biuret method using a fiber optic probe represented a convenient and reliable way of measuring serum total protein. It also demonstrated excellent precision and trueness using CRMs and patient samples, which made the method a simpler candidate reference method for serum protein measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39358468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.