Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358437›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Intelligence analysis of membrane distillation via machine learning models for pharmaceutical separation.

Abdullah Alkhammash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullah AlkhammashDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Shaqra, 11961, Saudi Arabia. alkhammash@su.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates simulation of pharmaceutical separation via membrane distillation process by computational simulation and machine learning modeling strategy. The efficacy of three regression models, i.e., Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), Gamma Regression, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) in predicting the solute concentration, C(mol/m³), was evaluated. The hyper-parameters were optimized by fine-tuning the models using the Red Deer Algorithm (RDA). Computational analyses were carried out for removal of pharmaceuticals from solution by membrane distillation in continuous mode. Mass transfer and machine learning models were implemented focusing on concentration of solute in the feed section of membrane. Results indicate that the Multi-layer Perceptron model achieved great accuracy with an R

Indexed as

DistillationMachine LearningAlgorithmsComputer SimulationMembranes, ArtificialPharmaceutical PreparationsSupport Vector MachineMembranes, ArtificialPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug separationGamma RegressionMembraneMulti-layer PerceptronSupport Vector Regression

Identifiers

PMID39358437
PMCPMC11447018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.