Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358365›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Minimal exposure durations reveal visual processing priorities for different stimulus attributes.

Renzo C Lanfranco, Andrés Canales-Johnson, Hugh Rabagliati, Axel Cleeremans, David Carmel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Repetitions trigger illusory awareness in implicit statistical learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Conscious awareness, sensory integration, and evidence accumulation in bodily self-perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renzo C LanfrancoDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Renzo.Lanfranco@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-0170
Andrés Canales-JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 2EB, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-8894
Hugh RabagliatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-5857
Axel CleeremansConsciousness, Cognition & Computation Group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neurosciences, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles, B1050, Brussels, Belgium.
David CarmelDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. David.Carmel@vuw.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-158X

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) EXPERIENCE - ADG101055060Ministry of Education, Government of Chile | Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research) 1240899RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/L01064X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human vision can detect a single photon, but the minimal exposure required to extract meaning from stimulation remains unknown. This requirement cannot be characterised by stimulus energy, because the system is differentially sensitive to attributes defined by configuration rather than physical amplitude. Determining minimal exposure durations required for processing various stimulus attributes can thus reveal the system's priorities. Using a tachistoscope enabling arbitrarily brief displays, we establish minimal durations for processing human faces, a stimulus category whose perception is associated with several well-characterised behavioural and neural markers. Neural and psychophysical measures show a sequence of distinct minimal exposures for stimulation detection, object-level detection, face-specific processing, and emotion-specific processing. Resolving ongoing debates, face orientation affects minimal exposure but emotional expression does not. Awareness emerges with detection, showing no evidence of subliminal perception. These findings inform theories of visual processing and awareness, elucidating the information to which the visual system is attuned.

Indexed as

Photic StimulationVisual PerceptionAdultAwarenessEmotionsFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39358365
PMCPMC11447214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.