ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2025
Linkage of the CF Foundation Patient Registry with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database.
Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulating Therapies on Liver Transplant Outcomes.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) maintains clinical data, including history of solid organ transplant, on people with cystic fibrosis (CF) who obtain care at CF Foundation-accredited care centers. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database is a collection of national data related to organ transplantation that supports research to evaluate solid organ transplant candidate and recipient outcomes.
methodsIndividuals in the CFFPR were matched to SRTR records using an algorithm that compared names, last four digits of social security numbers, date of birth and date of death. We evaluated match quality by summarizing the extent to which transplant status agreed between the two data sources by organ and year of listing or transplant. We summarized CFFPR-reported characteristics for lung and liver transplants in the year prior to transplant.
resultsA total of 7,594 individuals who participated in the CFFPR matched SRTR records with approximately 75% having at least one transplant record in SRTR. Over 97% of the matched population had a CF diagnosis reported to SRTR. In total, 5,253 people were identified as lung transplant recipients and 499 as liver transplant recipients in SRTR. Clinical characteristics for lung and liver transplants were consistent with the epidemiology of transplantation for people with CF.
conclusionsLinkage of the two data sources was successful, with high agreement between them supporting the use of the matched population as a valid resource to study transplantation in CF, particularly leveraging pre-transplant characteristics (collected in CFFPR) with detailed transplant data (collected in SRTR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.