ArticleInternational dental journal2025
Periodontitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsObservational studies have reported conflicting associations between periodontitis (PD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To overcome these limitations, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the potential association between PD and HCC.
methodsWe used summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of European ancestry, integrating data from chronic/acute periodontitis (CP/AP) samples (n1 = 34,615; n2 = 277,036; n3 = 410,811) and HCC samples (n1 = 456,348; n2 = 475,638). The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) approach represents our primary analysis method, supplemented by MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted-mode, and simple-mode methods. Pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests were also performed.
resultsIVW analysis suggested that PD had no effect on HCC (Group 1: odds ratio [OR] = 0.912, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.690-1.204, P = .514; Group 2: OR = 1.038, 95% CI = 0.895-1.203, P = .623; Group 3: OR = 0.966, 95% CI = 0.851-1.096, P = .591; Group 4: OR = 1.103, 95% CI = 0.576-2.113, P = .768; Group 5: OR = 1.257, 95% CI = 0.511-1.037, P = .540; Group 6: OR = 0.728, 95% CI = 0.511-1.037, P = .079). Four complementary analyses further support this conclusion. Both the IVW and MR-Egger results indicate that the instrumental variables in each group did not exhibit significant pleiotropy. MR-Egger regression analysis showed no evidence of pleiotropic effects.
conclusionOur MR analysis suggests that PD does not significantly impact the risk of developing HCC. These results provide a new perspective on the relationship between these 2 conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This MR study suggests no significant genetic causal relationship between PD and HCC, providing a new perspective. It indicates that clinicians may not need to over-intervene in periodontal disease to prevent liver cancer, thereby avoiding unnecessary psychological burden on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.