Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358026›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment.

Katharina Duecker, Keith B Doelling, Assaf Breska, Emily B J Coffey, Digavalli V Sivarao, Benedikt Zoefel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Rhythmic stimulation elicits multiple, concurrent neural responses.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A universal of speech timing: Intonation units form low-frequency rhythms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katharina DueckerDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.
Keith B DoellingUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, Inserm, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris F-75012, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-8114
Assaf BreskaMax-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-073X
Emily B J CoffeyConcordia University, Montréal, Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-7396
Digavalli V SivaraoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614.
Benedikt ZoefelCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), UMR 5549 CNRS - Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse F-31052, France benedikt.zoefel@cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When exposed to rhythmic stimulation, the human brain displays rhythmic activity across sensory modalities and regions. Given the ubiquity of this phenomenon, how sensory rhythms are transformed into neural rhythms remains surprisingly inconclusive. An influential model posits that endogenous oscillations entrain to external rhythms, thereby encoding environmental dynamics and shaping perception. However, research on neural entrainment faces multiple challenges, from ambiguous definitions to methodological difficulties when endogenous oscillations need to be identified and disentangled from other stimulus-related mechanisms that can lead to similar phase-locked responses. Yet, recent years have seen novel approaches to overcome these challenges, including computational modeling, insights from dynamical systems theory, sophisticated stimulus designs, and study of neuropsychological impairments. This review outlines key challenges in neural entrainment research, delineates state-of-the-art approaches, and integrates findings from human and animal neurophysiology to provide a broad perspective on the usefulness, validity, and constraints of oscillatory models in brain-environment interaction.

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsBrain WavesHumansModels, NeurologicalPeriodicitydynamical systemsevoked responseneural oscillationssensory rhythmssynchronization

Identifiers

PMID39358026
PMCPMC11450538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.