Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358024›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Neural Encoding of Bodies for Primate Social Perception.

Etienne Abassi, Anna Bognár, Bea de Gelder, Martin Giese, Leyla Isik, Alexander Lappe, Albert Mukovskiy, Marta Poyo Solanas, Jessica Taubert, Rufin Vogels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Etienne AbassiThe Neuro, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-0001
Anna BognárDepartment of Neuroscience, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Bea de GelderCognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EV, Netherlands rufin.vogels@kuleuven.be b.degelder@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-8986
Martin GieseSection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research & Centre for Integrative Neurocience, University Clinic Tuebingen, Tuebingen D-72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1178-2768
Leyla IsikCognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-0151
Alexander LappeSection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research & Centre for Integrative Neurocience, University Clinic Tuebingen, Tuebingen D-72076, Germany.
Albert MukovskiySection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research & Centre for Integrative Neurocience, University Clinic Tuebingen, Tuebingen D-72076, Germany.
Marta Poyo SolanasCognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EV, Netherlands.
Jessica TaubertThe School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-8068
Rufin VogelsDepartment of Neuroscience, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium rufin.vogels@kuleuven.be b.degelder@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

The neural computations underlying human social interaction recognitionR01MH132826 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Leyla Isik · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates, as social beings, have evolved complex brain mechanisms to navigate intricate social environments. This review explores the neural bases of body perception in both human and nonhuman primates, emphasizing the processing of social signals conveyed by body postures, movements, and interactions. Early studies identified selective neural responses to body stimuli in macaques, particularly within and ventral to the superior temporal sulcus (STS). These regions, known as body patches, represent visual features that are present in bodies but do not appear to be semantic body detectors. They provide information about posture and viewpoint of the body. Recent research using dynamic stimuli has expanded the understanding of the body-selective network, highlighting its complexity and the interplay between static and dynamic processing. In humans, body-selective areas such as the extrastriate body area (EBA) and fusiform body area (FBA) have been implicated in the perception of bodies and their interactions. Moreover, studies on social interactions reveal that regions in the human STS are also tuned to the perception of dyadic interactions, suggesting a specialized social lateral pathway. Computational work developed models of body recognition and social interaction, providing insights into the underlying neural mechanisms. Despite advances, significant gaps remain in understanding the neural mechanisms of body perception and social interaction. Overall, this review underscores the importance of integrating findings across species to comprehensively understand the neural foundations of body perception and the interaction between computational modeling and neural recording.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAnimalsBrainHumansPrimatesaction recognitionbody patchesbody perceptionextrastriate body areasocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID39358024
PMCPMC11450534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.