Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358016›Full record

ArticleGenome research2024

Nanopore strand-specific mismatch enables de novo detection of bacterial DNA modifications.

Xudong Liu, Ying Ni, Lianwei Ye, Zhihao Guo, Lu Tan, Jun Li, Mengsu Yang, Sheng Chen, Runsheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Replication-coupled hemimethylation inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. High-resolution metagenome assembly for modern long reads with myloasm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Decoding the genome and epigenome of avianFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xudong Liu *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-0990
Ying Ni *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Lianwei Ye *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Zhihao GuoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Lu TanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Mengsu YangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Sheng ChenState Key Lab of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China sheng.chen@polyu.edu.hk runsheli@cityu.edu.hk.
Runsheng LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China; sheng.chen@polyu.edu.hk runsheli@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-1563-1844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA modifications in bacteria present diverse types and distributions, playing crucial functional roles. Current methods for detecting bacterial DNA modifications via nanopore sequencing typically involve comparing raw current signals to a methylation-free control. In this study, we found that bacterial DNA modification induces errors in nanopore reads. And these errors are found only in one strand but not the other, showing a strand-specific bias. Leveraging this discovery, we developed Hammerhead, a pioneering pipeline designed for de novo methylation discovery that circumvents the necessity of raw signal inference and a methylation-free control. The majority (14 out of 16) of the identified motifs can be validated by raw signal comparison methods or by identifying corresponding methyltransferases in bacteria. Additionally, we included a novel polishing strategy employing duplex reads to correct modification-induced errors in bacterial genome assemblies, achieving a reduction of over 85% in such errors. In summary, Hammerhead enables users to effectively locate bacterial DNA methylation sites from nanopore FASTQ/FASTA reads, thus holds promise as a routine pipeline for a wide range of nanopore sequencing applications, such as genome assembly, metagenomic binning, decontaminating eukaryotic genome assemblies, and functional analysis for DNA modifications.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA MethylationNanoporesNanopore SequencingBacteriaGenome, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID39358016
PMCPMC11610603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.