ArticleGenome research2024
High-coverage nanopore sequencing of samples from the 1000 Genomes Project to build a comprehensive catalog of human genetic variation.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving missing human polymorphic inversions and other complex variants from ultralong read data.Genome research · 2026Article
- An Icelandic pangenome reference.Nature · 2026Article
- Predictive models of the genetic bases underlying budding yeast fitness in multiple environments.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Toward the clinical application of long-read sequencing in repeat-expansion disorders.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Nano-RAPID: Integrated Diagnosis for Sarcoma Using a Nanopore Sequencer.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2026Article
- ONT-only genome assembly of a Korean male individual using a semen sample.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Accurate imputation of inversions in human genomes using different algorithms and data sources.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Population-scale disease-associated tandem repeat analysis reveals locus and ancestry-specific insights.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dissecting the relationship between haplotypes around ATXN2 CAG repeats and the number of CAA interruptions by long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Uniparental Disomy Reveals Hidden Genetic Causes of Congenital Heart Disease.Research square · 2026Article
- Targeted long-read sequencing enables comprehensive analysis of the genetic and epigenetic landscape of inherited myopathies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- needLR: long-read structural variant annotation with population-scale frequency estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- How variant discovery redefines genetic prevalence: the case of cystine stone disease.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Complementarity of Long-Reads and Optical Mapping in Parkinson's Disease for Structural Variants.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Structural variant discovery and diagnostic impact in rare diseases from short-read and long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Ensilication preserves high-molecular weight native DNA for clinical long-read sequencing.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Germline sequence variation within the ribosomal DNA is associated with human complex traits.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Tandem repeats in human brain evolution and disease susceptibility.Molecules and cells · 2026Review
- Whole genome sequencing of pre-treatment and post-treatment locally advanced rectal cancer using long and short read technologies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sensitivity of HiFi long-read genome sequencing for difficult-to-detect pathogenic variants when applied to real-world clinical laboratory samples.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fewer than half of individuals with a suspected Mendelian or monogenic condition receive a precise molecular diagnosis after comprehensive clinical genetic testing. Improvements in data quality and costs have heightened interest in using long-read sequencing (LRS) to streamline clinical genomic testing, but the absence of control data sets for variant filtering and prioritization has made tertiary analysis of LRS data challenging. To address this, the 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) Oxford Nanopore Technologies Sequencing Consortium aims to generate LRS data from at least 800 of the 1KGP samples. Our goal is to use LRS to identify a broader spectrum of variation so we may improve our understanding of normal patterns of human variation. Here, we present data from analysis of the first 100 samples, representing all 5 superpopulations and 19 subpopulations. These samples, sequenced to an average depth of coverage of 37× and sequence read N50 of 54 kbp, have high concordance with previous studies for identifying single nucleotide and indel variants outside of homopolymer regions. Using multiple structural variant (SV) callers, we identify an average of 24,543 high-confidence SVs per genome, including shared and private SVs likely to disrupt gene function as well as pathogenic expansions within disease-associated repeats that were not detected using short reads. Evaluation of methylation signatures revealed expected patterns at known imprinted loci, samples with skewed X-inactivation patterns, and novel differentially methylated regions. All raw sequencing data, processed data, and summary statistics are publicly available, providing a valuable resource for the clinical genetics community to discover pathogenic SVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.