ArticleJournal of cutaneous pathology2026
Evaluation of Multiple Tissue Levels Frequently Upstages Patients With Clinically Localized Thin Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.
Article in Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Multiple Tissue Levels Frequently Upstages Patients With Clinically Localized Thin Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreslow thickness (BT), ulceration, and microsatellitosis are critical prognostic parameters for cutaneous melanoma staging. These parameters can vary depending on the number of tissue levels examined from individual paraffin blocks. We sought to evaluate all prognostic histopathologic parameters in melanoma for their variations between levels, taken at regular intervals, in a single study.
methodsWe analyzed 40 consecutive cases of primary cutaneous (nonacral) melanoma through five hematoxylin and eosin sections, taken at 100 μm intervals, for staging and prognostic parameters.
resultsExamination of additional levels resulted in (a) an increase in BT in 47.5% (19 out of 40) of cases and (b) detection of ulceration in a further 5% (2/40). This resulted in upstaging for 20% (8 out of 40) of patients (15% because of BT, 2.5% because of ulceration, and 2.5% because of BT and ulceration). The upstaging effect was incremental, with approximately 5% of patients upstaged with each additional 100 μm interval (up to 400 μm). Incipient ulceration and epidermal consumption were infrequent (10% of cases); however, when present, ulceration was subsequently observed in half of cases. We encountered no cases where microsatellitosis was detected at deeper levels.
conclusionThe performance of additional tissue levels is a simple and inexpensive procedure that can improve the accuracy of staging for patients with thin (pT1) primary cutaneous melanomas. It may be pertinent for pathologists to consider additional levels for thin melanomas when a BT measurement is close to a staging threshold (e.g., within 0.1-0.3 mm for pT1a vs. pT1b, or pT1b vs. pT2a), or when incipient ulceration is encountered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.