Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39357903›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Vulnerable older people's views on proactive care planning: a qualitative interview study in primary care.

Lisa Kastbom, Anna Olaison, Annette Sverker, Anna Segernäs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa KastbomDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden lisa.kastbom@liu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-7593
Anna OlaisonDepartment of Culture and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annette SverkerDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-4273
Anna SegernäsDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-7742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in old age often have complex care needs owing to multimorbidity and polypharmacy. This qualitative study is part of a larger ongoing Swedish intervention trial Secure And Focused primary care for older pEople (SAFE), including shorter care agreements based on person-centred patient goals.

aimTo explore, in a primary care setting, the views of older and vulnerable patients on a more systematic, proactive approach to care planning, including establishing and documenting care agreements based on person-centred goals. DESIGN &

settingIndividual semi-structured interviews with patients (

methodInterviews were conducted between June and October 2023. They were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Latent qualitative content analysis was used.

resultsThe following three categories, with 10 sub-categories, were found: I would like to live in the present, so why plan ahead? Let me decide versus they know best; and Care agreements usually went unnoticed. The latent theme - The ambivalence of care planning in the fourth age - was created to give a deeper meaning to the content of the categories.

conclusionThis study emphasises that older, vulnerable persons have varying attitudes towards participation in proactive care planning. This ambivalence may originate from the individual's desire to have their autonomy respected and express future care preferences on the one hand, and to avoid or postpone end-of-life conversations and care planning on the other hand. Patients also expressed a desire to be more actively involved in care planning. Although care agreements have the potential to increase patient involvement in proactive care planning, they often went unnoticed. The conversation itself was essential.

Indexed as

agedolder adultsprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39357903
PMCPMC12138017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.