Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39357868›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2024

ICG mapping of postoperative lymphatic leakage in the groin: a video article and literature review.

M Schubert, D O Bauerschlag, A Farrokh, N Maass, J Pape, I Alkatout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Schubert
D O Bauerschlag
A Farrokh
N Maass
J Pape
I Alkatout

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inguinofemoral lymphoceles are a common postoperative complication after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (LNE) and a challenge for patients as well as physicians. We report here our preliminary experience in the surgical management of a recurrent lymphocele using indocyanine green (ICG) detection, followed by robotic-assisted closure of the lymphatic leaks. Objectives: The aim of this article is to illustrate the surgical steps of ICG-assisted detection of inguinal lymphatic leaks and their surgical treatment by means of robot-assisted suturing. Furthermore, the feasibility of the approach will be evaluated. Materials and methods: A 59-year-old woman with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and previous conventional bilateral inguinofemoral LNE presented with symptomatic therapy-resistant lymphoceles in the groin. After a lengthy and frustrating course of standard therapy, she was offered the off-label option surgical treatment with ICG detection and subsequent robot-assisted ligation of the leaks, using the Da Vinci robotic system™. Main outcome measures: Perioperative data, specific aspects of the surgical approach specifics, objective and subjective outcomes of the new approach. Results: The procedure was performed as planned, with no intraoperative complications or device-related issues. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient developed no further lymphoceles. Conclusion: Visualisation of the leakage by ICG combined with minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopy is a promising therapy option. The pictures and videos demonstrate our experience in regard of the safety, feasibility, and usefulness of this procedure. Further studies will be needed, to prove the absolute efficacy of the technique and express a general recommendation in regard of this approach for the treatment of inguinofemoral lymphoceles.

Identifiers

PMID39357868
PMCPMC11569439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.