ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2024
Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A reclassification and comprehensive examination of uterine arteriovenous malformation: insights derived from a case series.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Case report: A rare but fatal complication of hysteroscopy-air embolism during treatment for missed abortion.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine scar defect (also called uterine niche or isthmocele) associated to retained products of conception (RPOC) is an uncommon occurrence following caesarean section. Typically, the primary indicator is abnormal vaginal bleeding, and an accurate diagnosis can be established through ultrasound evaluation. Several surgical and endoscopic treatments have been described. Objectives: To show a step-by-step video of combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach to perform isthmocele repair in a patient with caesarean scar defect and RPOC. Materials and Methods: We report a case of a 34-year-old patient who was referred to our Digital Hysteroscopic Clinic (DHC) for abnormal vaginal bleeding and persistent pelvic pain, three months after a caesarean section. A single-step diagnostic approach through transvaginal ultrasound and diagnostic hysteroscopy revealed the presence of an isthmic uterine niche within the caesarean scar area, containing a poorly vascularised heterogeneous hyperechoic focal mass measuring 33x11x33 millimetres. Main outcome measures: Removal of RPOC and surgical complications. Results: All retained placental tissue was removed and the uterine wall defect was corrected. No complications occurred and the patient was discharged two days after the procedure. Patient was asymptomatic at 3 months follow up and ultrasound and hysteroscopy showed a reconstituted uterine wall. Conclusion: An integrated hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach seems to be an effective conservative method to remove RPOC and perform isthmocele repair with optimal surgical results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.