ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2024
Clinical Interventions Following Escalations from a Continuous Respiratory Monitoring Service in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing Digital Respiratory Technologies for People With Respiratory Conditions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Continuous respiratory monitoring can support integrated care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, by coupling them with remote clinical personnel who triage patients in coordination with their health care providers. When deploying such services, there remains uncertainty surrounding outcomes when at-risk patients are proactively identified and escalated for provider evaluation. This study presents findings from a service deployed in a real-world COPD cohort by analyzing the clinical interventions made during in-person and telehealth pulmonary outpatient visits following remote escalations. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational study of real-world COPD patients at a multisite pulmonary practice was conducted. Patients who were enrolled in a continuous respiratory monitoring service for at least one year and were seen by a provider within 7 days of an escalation by the service (N=168) were included. To evaluate the potential impact of these escalations on provider and patient burden, medical charts from outpatient visits were manually reviewed and grouped into 6 categories based on the clinical action(s) taken by the provider. Results: A total of 245 outpatient visits occurred from 168 patients within 7 days of escalation. Of the 245 visits, 206 (84.1%) resulted in clinical intervention and 163 (66.5%) resulted in treatment consistent with acute exacerbations of COPD. A total of 1.6% of the outpatient visits resulted in referral to the emergency department. Conclusion: Provider encounters occurring following the escalation of a patient from a continuous respiratory monitoring service consistently resulted in that provider administering a treatment to the escalated patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.