ArticleBlood2025
How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ropeginterferon alfa-2b for prefibrotic myelofibrosis and lower-risk myelofibrosis requiring cytoreduction.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- POIESIS: a phase III study of add-on navtemadlin in JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis patients with a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Comparison of the enzymatic and cellular profiles of clinical JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myelofibrosis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- A European survey on allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT: focus on 'real world' experience of JAK inhibitors, splenomegaly management and novel agents in the transplant algorithm.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- From Coffee Alkaloid to Ovarian Targets: An Integrated Computational Framework for Trigonelline in Ovarian Aging.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Precision medicine in myelofibrosis: from molecular profiling to personalized therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- IRAK4 Targeting: A Breakthrough Approach to Combat Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe advent of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) inaugurated a novel era in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Four JAKis have been approved for intermediate or high-risk MF, in the United States. Regulatory approval of the first JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, in 2011, transformed the landscape of MF by markedly controlling splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, improving patients' quality of life, and prolonging survival. Fedratinib, the second approved JAKi, is preferred in the second-line setting. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib can cause myelosuppression and are recommended for patients with the myeloproliferative phenotype. The approval of 2 less-myelosuppressive JAKis, pacritinib and momelotinib, provided essential treatment options for patients with severe thrombocytopenia and anemia, respectively. Momelotinib and pacritinib are potent activin A receptor, type 1 inhibitors with consequent significant benefits for patients with anemia. Transfusion independence was achieved with momelotinib in patients who were severely anemic, and the association of transfusion independence with prolonged overall survival was demonstrated. Judicious treatment decisions regarding JAKis can be made with in-depth understanding of the pivotal clinical trials that evaluated JAKis and their therapeutic attributes and should be guided by the dominant clinical manifestations and the type/degree of cytopenia(s) (myeloproliferative/cytopenic phenotypes). This article reviews our clinical approach to treatment with JAKis and their sequencing in patients with MF by presenting 3 clinical vignettes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.