Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356984›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Association of Participation in Medicare's Oncology Care Model With Spending, Utilization, and Quality Outcomes Among Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Members.

Samyukta Mullangi, Benjamin Ukert, Andrea Devries, David Debono, Jason Santos, Michael J Fisch, Stephen M Schleicher, Amol S Navathe, Justin E Bekelman, Aaron L Schwartz and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Survivorship therapy needs after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: surveying opportunities for growth (STRONG).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samyukta MullangiTennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-8492
Benjamin UkertTexas A&M University, College Station, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-9573
Andrea DevriesElevance Health, Inc, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-6802
David DebonoElevance Health, Inc, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-5862
Jason SantosElevance Health, Inc, Indianapolis, IN.
Michael J FischCarelon Medical Benefits Management, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-5312-403X
Stephen M SchleicherTennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
Amol S NavatheDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-4988
Justin E BekelmanDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-7624-0188
Aaron L SchwartzDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Ravi B ParikhDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2692-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Oncology Care Model (OCM), a value-based payment model for traditional Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, yielded total spending reductions that were outweighed by incentive payments, resulting in net losses to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We studied whether the OCM yielded spillover effects in total episode spending, utilization, and quality among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) members, who were not targeted by the program. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis observational study used administrative claims from a large national payer, yielding 157,189 total patients with commercial insurance or MA with solid malignancies who initiated 229,376 systemic anticancer therapy episodes before (2012-2015) and during (2016-2021) the OCM at 125 OCM-participating practices (a subset of total OCM practices) and a 1:10 propensity-matched set of 860 non-OCM practices. We used difference-in-differences analyses to assess the association between the OCM and total episode spending, defined as medical spending during a 6-month episode. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization and emergency department (ED) utilization and quality measures.

resultsFrom the pre-OCM to the OCM period, mean total episode payments increased from $45,504 in US dollars (USD) to $46,239 USD for OCM-participating practices, and increased from $50,519 USD to $58,591 USD for non-OCM practices (adjusted difference-in-differences -$6,287 USD [95% CI, -$10,076 USD to -$2,498 USD],

conclusionThe OCM was associated with reductions in spending for nontargeted members, a spillover effect.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresMedical OncologyMedicare Part CNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMedicareQuality of Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39356984
PMCPMC11708986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.