ArticleBrazilian oral research2024
A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Diagnostic Charting on Panoramic Radiography: Comparison of YOLOv11 and YOLOv12.Odontology · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Loop Detection: A Panoramic Radiography Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of one-stage and two-stage deep learning models for instance segmentation of overhanging dental restorations on bitewing radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Segmentation-Based Multi-Class Detection and Radiographic Charting of Periodontal and Restorative Conditions on Bitewing Radiographs Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Detection accuracy of an AI platform for dental treatment features on panoramic radiographs - tooth- and patient-level analyses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental fillings, frequently used in dentistry to address various dental tissue issues, may pose problems when not aligned with the anatomical contours and physiology of dental and periodontal tissues. Our study aims to detect the prevalence and distribution of normal and overhanging filling restorations using a deep CNN architecture trained through supervised learning, on panoramic radiography images. A total of 10480 fillings and 2491 overhanging fillings were labeled using CranioCatch software from 2473 and 1850 images, respectively. After the data obtaining phase, validation (80%), training 10%), and test-groups (10%) were formed from images for both labelling. The YOLOv5x architecture was used to develop the AI model. The model's performance was assessed through a confusion matrix and sensitivity, precision, and F1 score values of the model were calculated. For filling, sensitivity is 0.95, precision is 0.97, and F1 score is 0.96; for overhanging were determined to be 0.86, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. The results demonstrate the capacity of the YOLOv5 algorithm to segment dental radiographs efficiently and accurately and demonstrate proficiency in detecting and distinguishing between normal and overhanging filling restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.