ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2024
Respectful Maternity Care during labour and postpartum in a tertiary hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurse Midwives' Perspectives on Women's Vocalization During the First and Second Stages of Labor: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRespectful maternity care (RMC) is a fundamental human right for women globally. Providing respectful care during labor and postpartum is crucial for the health and well-being of both mothers and newborns. The interactions between healthcare providers and women play a significant role in shaping their future healthcare decisions. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the prevalence of RMC during labor and postpartum from the patient's perspective at a tertiary care center.
methodsWe conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study at a tertiary center from February 20, 2023, to September 30, 2023. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institution. A total of 217 patients were included using consecutive sampling techniques. Data were collected through interviews using a structured questionnaire on respectful maternity care. The point estimate was calculated with a 95% Confidence Interval.
resultsThe prevalence of overall respectful maternity care (RMC) score was 81%. The score for right to confidentiality and privacy during labor was 91.7%, treated with dignity and respect was 90.87%, received equitable care free of discrimination was 86.41%, protection from physical harm and ill treatment was 84.02%, while protection of right to information/informed consent and choice'preference was 72.55%.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated a high prevalence of respectful maternity care, with most patients experiencing protection of confidentiality, dignity, equitable treatment, safety, and informed consent, indicating effective implementation of RMC practices at our tertiary care center.\ Keywords: labour; maternity care; postpartum; prevalence; tertiary hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.