Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356668›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Brain-machine convergent evolution: Why finding parallels between brain and artificial systems is informative.

Erez Simony, Shany Grossman, Rafael Malach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erez SimonyDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7688-1065
Shany GrossmanMax Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Rafael MalachDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system neurons manifest a rich diversity of selectivity profiles-whose precise role is still poorly understood. Following the striking success of artificial networks, a major debate has emerged concerning their usefulness in explaining neuronal properties. Here we propose that finding parallels between artificial and neuronal networks is informative precisely because these systems are so different from each other. Our argument is based on an extension of the concept of convergent evolution-well established in biology-to the domain of artificial systems. Applying this concept to different areas and levels of the cortical hierarchy can be a powerful tool for elucidating the functional role of well-known cortical selectivities. Importantly, we further demonstrate that such parallels can uncover novel functionalities by showing that grid cells in the entorhinal cortex can be modeled to function as a set of basis functions in a lossy representation such as the well-known JPEG compression. Thus, contrary to common intuition, here we illustrate that finding parallels with artificial systems provides novel and informative insights, particularly in those cases that are far removed from realistic brain biology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainModels, NeurologicalAnimalsEntorhinal CortexHumansNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsbrain–machine convergent-evolutionJPEGneuronal functionsneuronal tunning curves

Identifiers

PMID39356668
PMCPMC11474058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.