Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356481›Full record

ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2025

Quantitative Prostate MRI, From the

Daniel J A Margolis, Aritrick Chatterjee, Nandita M deSouza, Andriy Fedorov, Fiona Fennessy, Stephan E Maier, Nancy Obuchowski, Shonit Punwani, Andrei S Purysko, Rebecca Rakow-Penner and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel J A MargolisDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021.
Aritrick ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Nandita M deSouzaThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Andriy FedorovDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Fiona FennessyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Stephan E MaierDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Nancy ObuchowskiQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Shonit PunwaniCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Andrei S PuryskoDepartment of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Rebecca Rakow-PennerDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Amita Shukla-DaveDepartments of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Clare M TempanyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Michael BossGSK, London, England.
Dariya MalyarenkoDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Oliver Jonas · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
Development of Methods for a Simplified and Reliable Prostate Cancer MRI ExamR01CA241817 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAIER, STEPHAN E · 2020 to 2025
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241817NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate MRI has traditionally relied on qualitative interpretation. However, quantitative components hold the potential to markedly improve performance. The ADC from DWI is probably the most widely recognized quantitative MRI biomarker and has shown strong discriminatory value for clinically significant prostate cancer as well as for recurrent cancer after treatment. Advanced diffusion techniques, including intravoxel incoherent motion imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging, and specific implementations such as restriction spectrum imaging, purport even better discrimination but are more technically challenging. The inherent T1 and T2 of tissue also provide diagnostic value, with more advanced techniques deriving luminal water fraction and hybrid multidimensional MRI metrics. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, primarily using a modified Tofts model, also shows independent discriminatory value. Finally, quantitative lesion size and shape features can be combined with the aforementioned techniques and can be further refined using radiomics, texture analysis, and artificial intelligence. Which technique will ultimately find widespread clinical use will depend on validation across a myriad of platforms and use cases.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansMaleContrast MediabiomarkerMRIprostate cancerquantitative

Identifiers

PMID39356481
PMCPMC11961719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.