Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356439›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025

Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature.

Yusuke Matsui, Daiju Ueda, Shohei Fujita, Yasutaka Fushimi, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Koji Kamagata, Rintaro Ito, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akira Yamada, Mariko Kawamura and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. y-matsui@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-7886
Daiju UedaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, Japan.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutaka FushimiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiro TsuboyamaDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Japan.
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Rintaro ItoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-City, Osaka, Japan.
Akira YamadaMedical Data Science Course, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Mariko KawamuraDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Japan.
Noriyuki FujimaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Taiki NozakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Fuminari TatsugamiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional oncology provides image-guided therapies, including transarterial tumor embolization and percutaneous tumor ablation, for malignant tumors in a minimally invasive manner. As in other medical fields, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in interventional oncology has garnered significant attention. This narrative review describes the current state of AI applications in interventional oncology based on recent literature. A literature search revealed a rapid increase in the number of studies relevant to this topic recently. Investigators have attempted to use AI for various tasks, including automatic segmentation of organs, tumors, and treatment areas; treatment simulation; improvement of intraprocedural image quality; prediction of treatment outcomes; and detection of post-treatment recurrence. Among these, the AI-based prediction of treatment outcomes has been the most studied. Various deep and conventional machine learning algorithms have been proposed for these tasks. Radiomics has often been incorporated into prediction and detection models. Current literature suggests that AI is potentially useful in various aspects of interventional oncology, from treatment planning to post-treatment follow-up. However, most AI-based methods discussed in this review are still at the research stage, and few have been implemented in clinical practice. To achieve widespread adoption of AI technologies in interventional oncology procedures, further research on their reliability and clinical utility is necessary. Nevertheless, considering the rapid research progress in this field, various AI technologies will be integrated into interventional oncology practices in the near future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedical OncologyNeoplasmsHumansAblationArtificial intelligenceEmbolizationInterventional radiologyMachine learningOncology

Identifiers

PMID39356439
PMCPMC11790735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.