Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356408›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Application of biosurfactants in enhanced oil recovery ex-situ: a review.

Anny Andrade, Ana Mehl, Eduardo Mach, Paulo Couto, Claudia Regina Elias Mansur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anny AndradeSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. annybeatrizca@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-8832
Ana MehlSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo MachSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo CoutoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claudia Regina Elias MansurInstitute of Macromolecules, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

Shell Brasil Shell Brasil
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a growing focus on environmentally friendly solutions, biosurfactants derived from plants or microorganisms have gained attention for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) applications. Biosurfactants offer several advantages over existing options, including biodegradability, low toxicity, availability of raw materials, resistance to harsh reservoir conditions, and improved water/oil interfacial tension reduction. Different organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and plants, can produce these natural surfactants. Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. bacteria are extensively studied for their ability to produce biosurfactants using low-cost carbon and nitrogen sources, exhibiting excellent surface activity and low critical micellar concentration (CMC). Fungi, though less commonly used, can also produce biosurfactants, albeit with lower interfacial activity. Plant-derived natural surfactants find wide application in laboratory tests for EOR, despite having higher CMC. This review not only summarizes the current knowledge on biosurfactants but also offers a novel comparative analysis of those produced by bacteria, fungi, and plants, examining their CMC, surface tension, and interfacial tension properties. Additionally, it quantifies the number of publications on the use of biosurfactants for Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery ex-situ (MEOR ex-situ) over the past 30 years and compares these with biosurfactants derived from plant sources. Our study is unique in its comparative approach and the quantification of literature on MEOR ex-situ. The findings reveal that biosurfactants produced by bacteria generally exhibit superior surface activity, even at lower concentrations, compared to those produced by plants or fungi. This new comparative perspective and thorough literature analysis highlight the distinctive contributions of this study. Overall, the use of biosurfactants for EOR represents a promising approach to cleaner energy production, with the potential to reduce environmental impact while improving oil recovery.

Indexed as

BacteriaFungiPetroleumPlantsSurface-Active AgentsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiosurfactantsSurface TensionPetroleumSurface-Active AgentsBacillus sp.Biosurfactant injectionEnhanced oil recoveryMEOR ex-situPseudomonas Sp

Identifiers

PMID39356408
PMCPMC11711844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.