Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356407›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

The gut microbiota of wild birds undergoing rehabilitation as a reservoir of multidrug-resistant enterococci in a metropolitan area in Brazil.

Andrea de Andrade Rangel Freitas, Adriana Rocha Faria, Luiza Tomé Mendes, Vânia Lúcia Carreira Merquior, Daniel Marchesi Neves, Jeferson Rocha Pires, Lúcia Martins Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea de Andrade Rangel FreitasInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Adriana Rocha FariaInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Luiza Tomé MendesInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Vânia Lúcia Carreira MerquiorDepartamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia E Parasitologia, Universidade Do Estado Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Daniel Marchesi NevesCentro de Triagem de Animais, Silvestres Do Rio de Janeiro (CETAS-RJ), Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.
Jeferson Rocha PiresCentro de Reabilitação de Animais Selvagens da Universidade Estácio de Sá (CRAS-UNESA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lúcia Martins TeixeiraInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. lmt2@micro.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-7076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are ubiquitous usually commensal bacteria that can act as opportunistic pathogens frequently associated with resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes. A variety of animals may carry potentially harmful enterococci. In the present work, the occurrence and characteristics of enterococci recovered from the fecal microbiota of wild birds belonging to four families (Accipitridae, Cathartidae, Falconidae and Strigidae) were investigated. Enterococci were recovered from 104 (92.0%) fecal samples obtained from 113 birds, and 260 strains were selected for additional characterization. Enterococcus faecalis was the predominant species (63.8%), followed by Enterococcus hirae (16.2%), Enterococcus faecium (11.5%), Enterococcus gallinarum (5.4%), Enterococcus avium (1.5%), Enterococcus casseliflavus (0.8%), and Enterococcus raffinosus and Enterococcus cecorum (0.4% each). Major percentages (11.9% 75.0%) of nonsusceptibility were observed to quinolones (particularly to enrofloxacin), erythromycin, rifampin, nitrofurantoin, tetracycline and streptomycin. Gentamicin and ampicillin resistances (13.3% each) were only detected among E. faecium. A total of 133 (51.2%) strains were MDR, showing a large variety of MDR profiles, composed by simultaneous resistance encompassing 3 to 12 antimicrobials. MDR strains were found in 68.2% of the birds. Antimicrobial resistance was associated with the presence of the aac(6')-aph(2″)-Ia, aph(2″)-Id, ant(6)-Ia, ant(9)-Ia, ant(9)-Ib, tet(M), tet(L), tet(S), erm(B), mef(A/E), msrC, and vat(D) genes. The most common virulence genes were efaA, gelE, ace, eeP, and asa1. PFGE analysis revealed a large genetic diversity among most of the strains. MLST performed for 35 E. faecalis strains revealed 23 different STs, whereas 14 STs were found among 18 E. faecium strains. Hospital-associated lineages ST22, ST25, ST56, ST1274 were identified. The results show that the wild birds investigated can carry a diversity of potentially hazardous enterococcal strains displaying multiple antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes, reinforcing the assumption that these animals provide an important target to monitor the circulation of microorganisms that deserve consideration under the One Health perspective.

Indexed as

BirdsDisease ReservoirsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterococcusGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnimals, WildAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrazilFecesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistance genesEnterococcusGut microbiotaMultidrug resistanceWild birds

Identifiers

PMID39356407
PMCPMC11711916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.