ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
A clinical comparative study of an outpatient treatment group and an endoscopic sinus surgery group for maxillary sinus fungus ball.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Invasive Aspergillosis with Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis Following High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy: A Challenging Case of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to clarify the differences in the pathophysiology of maxillary sinus fungus balls (FB) among different case groups and to identify which patients with maxillary sinus FB would be suitable for outpatient procedures.
methodsThirty-four patients diagnosed with maxillary sinus FB between January 2017 and December 2021 were divided into two groups (O and S). We retrospectively compared the clinical and imaging characteristics, and the treatment outcomes between the groups. Group O comprised 12 patients (13 sides) treated in an outpatient clinic and Group S comprised 15 patients (16 sides) treated with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
resultsCompared to Group S, Group O had more patients with an enlarged maxillary sinus membranous portion, and shadows indicative of fungal masses (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In particular, the anteroposterior ratio of the open maxillary sinus membranous area was 0.68 ± 0.16 in Group O and 0.5 ± 0.12 in Group S. After surgery, Group O exhibited greater anteroposterior expansion of the maxillary sinus membranous portion compared to Group S (P < 0.01). Additionally, Group O had more patients with shadows in sinuses other than the maxillary sinus (P < 0.01) and medial displacement of the uncinate process (P < 0.01) than Group S. In addition, Group O required fewer procedures and hospital visits than Group S (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively).
conclusionsDetermining the indications for outpatient procedures while considering the pathophysiology of maxillary sinus FB can significantly benefit patients and medical professionals in terms of safety and medical costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39356354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.