Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39356326›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2024

Reductions in inpatient and outpatient mental health care in germany during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - What can we learn for a better crisis preparedness?

Fabian Baum, Jochen Schmitt, Oliver Nagel, Josephine Jacob, Martin Seifert, Kristina Adorjan, Oliver Tüscher, Klaus Lieb, Lars Peer Hölzel, Hauke Felix Wiegand

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabian BaumCenter for Evidence-Based Health Care (ZEGV), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Fabian.Baum@ukdd.de.
Jochen SchmittCenter for Evidence-Based Health Care (ZEGV), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Oliver NagelInGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Josephine JacobInGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Martin SeifertCenter for Evidence-Based Health Care (ZEGV), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kristina AdorjanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Oliver TüscherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Klaus LiebDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lars Peer HölzelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Hauke Felix WiegandDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, reports from several European mental health care systems hinted at important changes in utilization. So far, no study examined changes in utilization in the German mental health care inpatient and outpatient mental health care system comprehensively.

methodsThis longitudinal observational study used claims data from two major German statutory health insurances, AOK PLUS and BKK, covering 162,905 inpatients and 2,131,186 outpatients with mental disorders nationwide. We analyzed changes in inpatient and outpatient mental health service utilization over the course of the first two lockdown phases (LDPs) of the pandemic in 2020 compared to a pre-COVID-19 reference period dating from March 2019 to February 2020 using a time series forecast model.

resultsWe observed significant decreases in the number of inpatient hospital admissions by 24-28% compared to the reference period. Day clinic admissions were even further reduced by 44-61%. Length of stay was significantly decreased for day clinic care but not for inpatient care. In the outpatient sector, the data showed a significant reduction in the number of incident outpatient diagnoses.

conclusionIndirect evidence regarding the consequences of the reductions in both the inpatient and outpatient sector of care described in this study is ambiguous and direct evidence on treatment outcomes and quality of trans-sectoral mental healthcare is sparse. In line with WHO and OECD we propose a comprehensive mental health system surveillance to prepare for a better oversight and thereby a better resilience during future global major disruptions.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareCOVID-19HospitalizationMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansInpatientsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsClaims dataInpatient treatmentMental health careOutpatient treatmentStatutory health insurance

Identifiers

PMID39356326
PMCPMC11579190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.