ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024
Tethered cord prevalence among patients with prenatal or postnatal myelomeningocele repair.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyelomeningocele (MMC) is a severe form of spina bifida characterized by spinal cord extrusion into a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) filled sac which may lead to lifelong disability. Repair of these lesions have classically occurred shortly after birth, but more recently, prenatal myelomeningocele repair techniques have been elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of surgery, particularly with subsequent spinal cord tethering, in patients with prenatal myelomeningocele closure and those with postnatal repair surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study which assessed patients from April 2002 to April 2020, the data of 18 total patients with MMC were reviewed. Nine patients from each group were included, closed prenatally or postnatally, respectively. Demographic information including age and sex, birth week, infant comorbidities, presence of dermoid or lipoma, cutaneous stigmata, total number and timing of detethering procedures, presence of Chiari malformation, and need for VPS was obtained.
resultsEighteen patients including nine infants closed prenatally and nine infants with myelomeningoceles closed postnatally were reviewed. The mean age was 4 ± 3 years and 6.22 ± 2.4 in prenatal and postnatal retrospectively. There was a significant relationship between the number of detethering procedures (p-value = 0.03) and the need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) (p-value = 0.01) between the groups, with the prenatal closure group having lower rates of each. There was no significant difference between the groups in regard to the mean age at the detethering procedure (p = 0.4), sex (p = 0.09), birth week (p = 0.8), comorbidities (p = 0.8), presence of intraspinal dermoid or lipoma (p = 0.09), presence of cutaneous stigma (p = 0.08), Chiari (p = 0.6), fatty filum (p = 0.08), syrinx (p = 0.4), bone anomaly (p = 0.4), and spina bifida neurological scale (p = 0.66).
conclusionThere was a significant relationship between the two groups in terms of the number of detethering procedures, and the need for VPS. Our data represents a possible difference in the need for detethering surgeries and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placements between patients with prenatal and postnatal myelomeningocele closures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39356312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.