ArticleRecent advances in drug delivery and formulation2024
Optimizing Microfluidic Channel Design with High-Performance Materials for Safe Neonatal Drug Delivery.
Article in Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDesigning the microfluidic channel for neonatal drug delivery requires proper considerations to enhance the efficiency and safety of drug substances when used in neonates. Thus, this research aims to evaluate high-performance materials and optimize the channel design by modeling and simulation using COMSOL multiphysics in order to deliver an optimum flow rate between 0. 3 and 1 mL/hr.
methodSome of the materials used in the study included PDMS, glass, COC, PMMA, PC, TPE, and hydrogels, and the evaluation criterion involved biocompatibility, mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and ease of fabrication. The simulation was carried out in the COMSOL multiphysics platform and demonstrated the fog fluid behavior in different channel geometries, including laminar flow and turbulence. The study then used systematic changes in design parameters with the aim of establishing the best implementation models that can improve the efficiency and reliability of the drug delivery system. The comparison was based mostly on each material and its appropriateness in microfluidic usage, primarily in neonatal drug delivery. The biocompatibility of the developed materials was verified using the literature analysis and adherence to the ISO 10993 standard, thus providing safety for the use of neonatal devices. Tensile strength was included to check the strength of each material to withstand its operation conditions. Chemical resistance was also tested in order to determine the compatibility of the materials with various drugs, and the possibility of fabrication was also taken into consideration to identify appropriate materials that could be used in the rapid manufacturing of the product.
resultsThe results we obtained show that PDMS, due to its flexibility and simplicity in simulation coupled with more efficient channel designs which have been extracted from COMSOL, present a feasible solution to neonatal drug delivery.
conclusionThe present comparative study serves as a guide on the choice of materials and design of microfluidic devices to help achieve safer and enhanced drug delivery systems suitable for the delicate reception of fragile neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39356100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.