ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024
LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incomplete adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors in a capillaroscopy-based mortality analysis of Raynaud's phenomenon.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- When does laboratory completeness become a quality indicator in early arthritis referral?Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Beyond forest plots: trial sequential analysis of magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) · 2026Article
- Defining muscle-dominant ANCA-associated vasculitis: the importance of systematic muscle MRI assessment.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Liver stiffness in fibrotic ILD: a CTD-ILD biomarker or a phenotype-dependent signal of systemic fibrosis?Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Methodological considerations in interpreting short-term functional gains after structured hand massage in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Strengthening Community-based Preventive Psychiatry-related Interventional Research in India by Employing SWOT Analysis.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Citations of Retracted Publications Should Be Discounted From One's Bibliometric Indicator.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Advances in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: investing in training of multidisciplinary teams and developing health care infrastructure.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Sleep positional therapy for patients with systemic sclerosis and nighttime gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in osteoarthritis radiotherapy: unresolved questions and the need for joint-specific evidence.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Patient opinion in rheumatology matters.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Beaten copper skull appearance in pediatric chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: a possible clue in the initial radiological examination.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor: social determinants of health in managing late-onset rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- From skin to bone: sun avoidance and osteoarthritis risk.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Recommendations for Image and Video Articles in Scholarly Publishing.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Presenting New Ideas and Opinions in Academic Journals.JMA journal · 2025Article
- Concise Recommendations for EDitorials: Enhancing Narratives and Composition Effectively (CREDENCE).Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- Conscience at the End of Life.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correspondence in the form of letters to the editor serves multiple scholarly purposes, including critiquing previously published articles, engaging in discourse with other correspondents, commenting on the journal's structure or style, and contributing insights for future publications. The composition of such letters warrants meticulous attention, as they play a crucial role in fostering communication between the journal and its readership. Adherence to specific principles is essential in crafting an effective letter to the editor. These communications should be concise, lucid, and adhere to a professional tone. The content should be constructive in nature and substantiated by rigorous scientific evidence and appropriate citations. The structure of a letter to the editor typically encompasses several key components: a title, an opening section, the main body of the correspondence, a closing statement, and a list of references. This article aims to establish Letter to the Editor Standards as a comprehensive guide for authors, reviewers, and editorial boards, thereby enhancing the quality and impact of this crucial form of academic discourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.