ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Network pharmacology and molecular docking approach to elucidate the mechanisms of safflower, phellodendron, scutellaria baicalensis, coptis, and gardenia in hand-foot syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming a Roadblock into a Roadmap: Evolving HFSR Management From Adverse Event to Efficacy Biomarker.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Cardiovascular and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Sharing common ground through SIRT1 pathways.World journal of cardiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Safflower, phellodendron, scutellaria baicalensis, coptis, and gardenia (SPSCG) are medicinal plants with a wide range of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. However, the related mechanism of SPSCG against hand-foot syndrome (HFS) has yet to be revealed. Objective: To investigate the mechanisms of SPSCG in the treatment of HFS using the Network Pharmacology. Methods: Active ingredients and targets of SPSCG for HFS were screened by the Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) and Swiss Target Prediction databases. Potential therapeutic targets were collected from the GeneCards and OMIM databases. Subsequently, protein-protein interactions (PPI), Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, and pathways from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were performed to investigate the potential mechanism of the SPSCG in HFS. Then, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to predict the binding interactions between the active compound and the core target. Finally, vitro experiments were used to verify the repair effect of key ingredients of SPSCG on cell damage caused by 5-Fluorouracil. Results: Quercetin, kaempferol, β-sitosterol, and stigmasterol were identified as the major active components of SPSCG. GO analysis showed a total of 1,127 biological processes, 42 terms cellular components, and 57 molecular functions. KEGG analysis showed that the MAPK, TNF, and IL-17 signaling pathways were significantly enriched. The PPI analysis discovered that EGFR, CASP3, AKT1, CCND1, and CTNNB1 shared the highest centrality among all target genes. The experimental results confirmed that these SPSCG active ingredients could treat HFS by reducing inflammation reaction and promoting cell damage repair. Conclusion: SPSCG may alleviate HFS by exerting antioxidative effects and suppressing inflammatory responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.