Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355798›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2024

"Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus other treatments for stone management in horseshoe kidneys: A systematic review".

Theodoros Spinos, Vasileios Tatanis, Christian Seitz, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Theodoros SpinosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Vasileios TatanisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Christian SeitzDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis represents the most frequent complication of horseshoe kidneys. All known approaches for stone disease management have been reported in these patients, including Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, open surgery and laparoscopy. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with other least-invasive procedures in patients with horseshoe kidneys. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, PubMed®, Scopus® and Cochrane® primary databases were systematically screened, from inception to 29 May 2023. Both prospective and retrospective comparative studies including patients with horseshoe kidneys and urolithiasis, who underwent Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and other treatments for stones management, were eligible. Non comparative studies and case series were also included. A total of 10 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. In total 583 patient underwent Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and other treatments for stone management in included studies. Stone free rates ranged from 57.1% to 88% for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, from 55.6% to 100% for ureteroscopy, from 27.3% to 83.3% for Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy and was 100% for pyelolithotomy and 71.4% for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in combination with ureteroscopy. Although percutaneous Nephrolithotomy was associated with more complications when compared to other treatment modalities, most of them were Grade I or Grade II ones, according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification System. Management of urolithiasis can be efficiently and safely accomplished in almost all cases of horseshoe kidneys. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy all represent excellent choices for the treatment of stones in these patients, being feasible, efficient and safe. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy was associated with the highest stone-free rates, but also with the highest complication rates. Access should be ideally performed via the upper poles. Optimal stone management in patients with horseshoe kidneys depends on stone burden, stone location and surgeon's preference.

Indexed as

horseshoe kidneyPCNLpyelolithotomySWLureteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID39355798
PMCPMC11441046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.