Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355796›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2024

The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression after surgery in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Antonio Benito Porcaro, Andrea Panunzio, Rossella Orlando, Alessandro Tafuri, Sebastian Gallina, Alberto Bianchi, Emanuele Serafin, Giovanni Mazzucato, Francesca Montanaro, Alberto Baielli and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Antonio Benito PorcaroDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Andrea PanunzioDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Rossella OrlandoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro TafuriDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Sebastian GallinaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alberto BianchiDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Emanuele SerafinDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni MazzucatoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Francesca MontanaroDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alberto BaielliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Francesco ArtoniDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Francesco DitonnoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Luca RoggeroDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Andrea FranceschiniDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Michele BoldiniDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo Pierangelo TreccaniDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro VecciaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo RizzettoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Vincenzo De MarcoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore SiracusanoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Maria Angela CerrutoDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo BertoloDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We tested whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram for the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) may represent a predictor of disease progression after surgical management in high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to the European Association of Urology. Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2021, HR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were identified. The 2012 Briganti nomogram was evaluated as a continuous and categorical variable, which was dichotomized using the median. The risk of disease progression, defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence/distant metastases was assessed by Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 204 patients were identified. The median 2012 Briganti nomogram score resulted 12.0% (IQR: 6.0-22.0%). PLNI was detected in 57 (27.9%) cases. Compared to patients who had preoperatively a 2012 Briganti nomogram score ≤12%, those with a score >12% were more likely to present with higher percentage of biopsy positive cores, palpable tumors at digital rectal examination, high-grade cancers at prostate biopsies, and unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen. At multivariable Cox regression analyses, disease progression, which occurred in 85 (41.7%) patients, was predicted by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score (HR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00-1.03; Conclusions: The 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in HR PCa patients treated with RARP and ePLND. As the score increased, so patients were more likely to experience disease progression, independently by the occurrence of PLNI. The association between the nomogram, unfavorable pathology and tumor behavior might turn out to be useful for selecting a subset of patients needing different treatment paradigms in HR disease.

Indexed as

high-risk diseasenomogrampelvic lymph node dissectionprogressionProstate cancerrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39355796
PMCPMC11441050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.