Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355752›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2024

The psychosocial impact of alopecia in men: A mixed-methods survey study.

Fabio Zucchelli, Abbi Mathews, Nick Sharratt, Kerry Montgomery, Jen Chambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabio ZucchelliThe Centre for Appearance Research University of the West of England Bristol UK.
Abbi MathewsThe Centre for Appearance Research University of the West of England Bristol UK.
Nick SharrattFormerly at the Centre for Appearance Research University of the West of England Bristol UK.
Kerry MontgomeryFormerly at Alopecia UK (Registered charity no. 1111304) Shipley UK.
Jen ChambersFormerly at Alopecia UK (Registered charity no. 1111304) Shipley UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The most common forms of hair loss in men, alopecia areata (AA) (an autoimmune condition) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA) (pattern baldness), alter individuals' appearance in ways that may impact psychological and social wellbeing. We currently have a limited understanding about this impact of alopecia in men, their support needs, and preferences. Objectives: We sought to investigate and explore the psychosocial impact of alopecia on men, alongside their experiences of treatment and support. Methods: The study used a mixed methods cross-sectional online survey with 177 men aged 17-79: 83 with AGA and 94 with AA. Quantitative questions included purpose-made rating scales of men's support experiences, and standardised measures of wellbeing and appearance-focused anxiety. Qualitative data comprised participants' answers to an open-ended question asking about their subjectively salient experiences related to their alopecia. Results: The combined findings indicate that while participants in both subsamples had sought minimal support for psychosocial concerns, such concerns were in fact commonplace. Over half of participants (56%-57%) shared qualitative accounts of depleted confidence, while wellbeing scores were on average lower than matched norms. Participants identifying as sexual minority also reported greater appearance-focused anxiety compared to those identifying as straight. Conclusions: The apparent contrast between participants' minimal help-seeking and accounts of affected wellbeing suggests an unmet support need for men with alopecia. Masculine norms may impede men from accessing psychosocial support, both by discouraging help-seeking behaviours and by encouraging minimisation of appearance concerns. The findings also suggest sexual minority status may pose a greater risk of distress in affected men.

Identifiers

PMID39355752
PMCPMC11442044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.