Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355751›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2024

The clinical and dermatoscopic features of penile pigmentation in men with genital lichen sclerosus.

Mariel L James, Georgios Kravvas, Aimilios Lallas, Chris B Bunker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariel L JamesDepartment of Dermatology University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1903-4326
Georgios KravvasDepartment of Dermatology University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-0149
Aimilios LallasFirst Department of Dermatology School of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences Aristotle University Thessaloniki Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-0964
Chris B BunkerDepartment of Dermatology University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-7483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Benign male genital pigmentation is a confusing field with poorly defined terminology. This entity is frequently encountered in our male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc) cohort and suggests an association with prior inflammation, however there is a limited literature on the topic. Objectives: This paper describes the attributes of 21 patients with MGLSc and features of benign genital pigmentation, reviews the existing literature on benign male genital pigmentation and makes recommendations for better practice. Methods: We prospectively identified 21 patients with MGLSc and clinical diagnoses of benign penile pigmentation who attended specialist male genital dermatoses clinics. Relevant findings were abstracted from clinical notes, outpatient letters, medical photographs, dermatoscopic images and histological reports. Results: The clinical features of this cohort are discussed and the dermatoscopic images analysed. 15 of 21 patients were followed up for over 2 years and all of these had stable appearance of pigmentation. 87% reported pigmentation to have emerged after the onset of MGLSc symptoms, with latency ranging from one to over 25 years. The terms lentiginosis, melanosis, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation are discussed in context of the existing literature. Conclusions: We propose that genital lentiginosis and melanosis are clinically indistinguishable macroscopically and are on a clinical and histopathological spectrum. Although there is a compelling narrative that genital melanosis is most often truly benign, there is also emerging evidence to suggest an increased risk of penile melanoma in patients with MGLSc. Furthermore, pigmented lesions in MGLSc can portray concerning morphological features even when benign. A low threshold for biopsy and follow-up is thus warranted.

Identifiers

PMID39355751
PMCPMC11442078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.