ArticleSkin health and disease2024
The use of a surgical logbook to improve training and patient safety: A retrospective analysis of 6 years' experience in Bristol, UK.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The use of a surgical logbook to improve training and patient safety: A retrospective analysis of 6 years' experience in Bristol, UK.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Logbooks can be a useful educational tool. Although their use in medical training has been greatly explored, there is limited research into their application throughout a clinician's career. We created a surgical logbook to allow clinicians to record their skin surgery procedures and reflect on the histological diagnosis and clearance margins achieved. Objectives: We provide a retrospective analysis to evaluate the usefulness of the logbook as an analytical and educational tool in a dermatology department, particularly for maintaining exemplary complete excision rates. Methods: Data was collected from clinicians who conducted skin surgery in Bristol, UK. Cases were entered at the time of surgery, collecting data on body site, clinical margin, suspected diagnosis, type of procedure and closure. Following receipt of histological results, data on histological excision margins and tumour type was entered. Each clinician submitted data for a minimum of 3 months each year, and data collection ran from April 2012 until March 2018. Results: Data from 5161 excision surgeries was collected over the 6-year period. On histological diagnosis, excisions constituted 50% Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), 12% Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), 9% Malignant Melanoma (MM) and 1% Lentigo Maligna (LM), and 28% 'Other' (rarer malignancies, melanoma wide local excision scars and pre-cancerous/benign lesions). The department was found to have good diagnostic concordance: BCC 92%, SCC 87%, MM 80% and LM 53%. Overall complete excision rate was high at 97.07%. The most successfully excised cancer was BCC (97.50%), then SCC (97.14%) MM (96.48%) and LM (95.23%). The department provided many complex surgeries including 8.3% flaps and 8.5% grafts. Average lesion diameter was 11 mm (range 2-90 mm). There was a significant improvement in excision rates seen over the years for BCC, MM and LM. Although there was no significant difference found for SCC, this group began the study with already high clearance rates. Conclusion: This surgical logbook supports improved training and continues professional development. We encourage more departments to use this logbook and share the data that they produce. This could improve their excision rates, patient experience, and save them up to £28 000 per year.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.