ArticleSkin health and disease2024
Comparing antibiotic prescribing patterns for hidradenitis suppurativa between dermatology and non-dermatology ambulatory providers.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing antibiotic prescribing patterns for hidradenitis suppurativa between dermatology and non-dermatology ambulatory providers.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral antibiotics are a mainstay of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) primarily due to their anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial properties. Because antibiotics are frequently prescribed to treat HS, concerns exist regarding antibiotic stewardship. There is a paucity of literature comparing how antibiotic prescribing patterns for HS differ between dermatology and non-dermatology clinicians in the ambulatory setting. Objective: This study aims to compare the antibiotic prescribing patterns of dermatology versus non-dermatology clinicians treating HS in the ambulatory setting. Methods: We utilised the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) to identify visits for HS patients from 2005 to 2016. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to compare the likelihood of prescribing (1) antibiotics and (2) tetracyclines between dermatology and non-dermatology clinicians in the ambulatory setting. Results: We identified a total of 2 424 125 (weighted) HS visits. Approximately 28.0% of visits were conducted by dermatology clinicians, while 72.0% were conducted by non-dermatology clinicians. Antibiotics were prescribed in 51.9% of visits. Tetracyclines were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics among visits with dermatology clinicians (33.4%), while penicillins/cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic among visits with non-dermatology clinicians (14.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated no difference in the overall likelihood of prescribing antibiotic therapy between dermatology and non-dermatology clinicians ( Conclusion: In conclusion, dermatology clinicians were significantly more likely to prescribe tetracyclines than non-dermatology clinicians for HS patient visits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.