ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2024
An In-depth Exploration of the Interplay between fMRI Methods and Theory in Cognitive Neuroscience.
Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- And We'll Have Fun Fun Fun….Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a cornerstone of cognitive neuroscience since its invention in the 1990s. The methods that we use for fMRI data analysis allow us to test different theories of the brain, thus different analyses can lead us to different conclusions about how the brain produces cognition. There has been a centuries-long debate about the nature of neural processing, with some theories arguing for functional specialization or localization (e.g., face and scene processing) while other theories suggest that cognition is implemented in distributed representations across many neurons and brain regions. Importantly, these theories have received support via different types of analyses; therefore, having students implement hands-on data analysis to explore the results of different fMRI analyses can allow them to take a firsthand approach to thinking about highly influential theories in cognitive neuroscience. Moreover, these explorations allow students to see that there are not clearcut "right" or "wrong" answers in cognitive neuroscience, rather we effectively instantiate assumptions within our analytical approaches that can lead us to different conclusions. Here, I provide Python code that uses freely available software and data to teach students how to analyze fMRI data using traditional activation analysis and machine-learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Altogether, these resources help teach students about the paramount importance of methodology in shaping our theories of the brain, and I believe they will be helpful for introductory undergraduate courses, graduate-level courses, and as a first analysis for people working in labs that use fMRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.