ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2021
Fully Automated
Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of 68 Ga-labeled Macroaggregated Albumin Particles for Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) Dosimetry and Treatment Planning.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Pulmonary uptake value (PUV): a new quantification method for lung PET/CT imaging.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Validation of a radiosynthesis method and a novel quality control system for [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024Article
- New Automated Method for Lung Functional Volumes Delineation with Lung Perfusion PET/CT Imaging.Cancers · 2023Article
- Radiopharmaceutical Labelling for Lung Ventilation/Perfusion PET/CT Imaging: A Review of Production and Optimization Processes for Clinical Use.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Chemical and Physical Characterisation of Macroaggregated Human Serum Albumin: Strength and Specificity of Bonds withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Radiation exposure to nuclear medicine technologists performing a V/Q PET: Comparison with conventional V/Q scintigraphy, [Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for regional lung function assessment. Our aim was to develop and validate a fast, simple, and fully automated GMP compliant [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.