Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355597›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

Advances in the Management of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): A Comprehensive Review.

Arianna Morena, Federico Giacobbe, Ovidio De Filippo, Filippo Angelini, Francesco Bruno, Stefano Siliano, Giuseppe Giannino, Veronica Dusi, Matteo Bianco, Carloalberto Biolé and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arianna MorenaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Federico GiacobbeDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Ovidio De FilippoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Filippo AngeliniDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Francesco BrunoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Stefano SilianoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe GianninoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Veronica DusiDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Matteo BiancoDivision of Cardiology, A.O.U San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Carloalberto BioléDivision of Cardiology, A.O.U San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Ferdinando VarbellaInterventional Cardiology Unit, Rivoli Infermi Hospital, 10098 Torino, Italy.
Enrico CerratoInterventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Fabrizio D'AscenzoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Gaetano Maria De FerrariDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but significant cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), primarily affecting young women, often during pregnancy. Despite its rarity, SCAD poses challenges due to limited evidence on management strategies. This review examines the current state of art of SCAD management, integrating interventional and clinical insights from recent studies. The epidemiology of SCAD is related to its elusive nature, representing only a small fraction of ACS cases, while certainly underestimated. Proposed risk factors include genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. Angiographic classification may help in SCAD diagnosis, but confirmation often relies on intracoronary imaging. Conservative management constitutes the primary approach, showing efficacy in most cases, although optimal antiplatelet therapy (APT) remains debated due to bleeding risks associated with intramural hematoma. Revascularization is reserved for high-risk cases, guided by angiographic and clinical criteria, with a focus on restoring flow rather than resolving dissection. Interventional strategies emphasize a minimalist approach to reduce complications, utilizing techniques such as balloon dilation and stent placement tailored to individual cases. Long-term outcomes highlight the risk of recurrence, necessitating vigilant follow-up and arrhythmic risk assessment, particularly in patients presenting with ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, SCAD management always represents a challenge for the physician, both from a clinical and interventional point of view. Recent clinical evidence and a multidisciplinary approach are vital for optimizing patient outcomes and preventing recurrence. This review offers a concise framework for navigating the complexities of SCAD management in clinical practice and proposes an algorithm for its management.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndrome (ACS)antiplatelet therapyfibromuscular dysplasiamyocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)pregnancy-associatedspontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)women

Identifiers

PMID39355597
PMCPMC11440404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.