Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355594›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

The 2023 European Task Force Criteria for Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Historical Background and Review of Main Changes.

Francesca Graziano, Alessandro Zorzi, Simone Ungaro, Barbara Bauce, Ilaria Rigato, Alberto Cipriani, Martina Perazzolo Marra, Kalliopi Pilichou, Cristina Basso, Domenico Corrado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesca GrazianoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Alessandro ZorziDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Simone UngaroDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Barbara BauceDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Ilaria RigatoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Alberto CiprianiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Martina Perazzolo MarraDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Kalliopi PilichouDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Cristina BassoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Domenico CorradoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a cardiac disease featured by non-ischemic myocardial scarring linked to ventricular electrical instability. As there is no single gold-standard test, diagnosing ACM remains challenging and a combination of specific criteria is needed. The diagnostic criteria were first defined and widespread in 1994 and then revised in 2010, approaching and focusing primarily on right ventricular involvement without considering any kind of left ventricular variant or phenotype. Years later, in 2020, with the purpose of overcoming previous limitations, the Padua Criteria were introduced by an international expert report. The main novel elements were the introduction of specific criteria for left ventricular variants as well as the use of cardiac magnetic resonance for tissue characterization and scar detection. The last modifications and refinement of these criteria were published at the end of 2023 as the European Task Force criteria, by a "head-quarter" of ACM international experts, proving the emerging relevance of this condition besides its difficult diagnosis. In this review, emphasizing the progress in understanding the aetiology of the cardiomyopathy, an analysis of the new criteria is presented. The introduction of the term "scarring/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy" sets an important milestone in this field, underlying how non-ischemic myocardial scarring-typical of ACM-and arrhythmic susceptibility could be the main pillars of numerous different phenotypic variants regardless of etiology.

Indexed as

arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathycardiac magnetic resonancediagnosissudden deathventricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID39355594
PMCPMC11440389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.